The art I own = I am a creep ?

Because every art print I bought over the past 3 years has been black and white photography, I decided a while ago to switch things up for my next move. But more recently I noticed another (more bizarre) commonality between the prints I own — and now my decision to diversify might be a little more pressing.

See if you can spot what my favorite photography prints have in common. Below, in the order they were purchased, are: (1) “Bis” by fashion photographer Pamela Hanson, (2) “Two Students in Classical Costume” by painter Thomas Eakins, 1883; and (3) “Halles” by photographer Frank Horvat, 1957.







Did you catch it? What they’ve got in common (that I’m totally weirded out by) is all three are of women being creepily observed by some dude.

Whoa! How did I miss this when I’ve owned the first two for almost three years? Does this coincidence indicate some sort of mental issue I need to look into further? Or is it simply time to embrace my inner-creep, who I guess at least appreciates fine photography??